But is the science still settled?: New Paper Suggests Long-Term Water Vapour Feedback is Negative
Negative trends in q as found in the NCEP data would imply that long-term water vapor feedback is negative—that it would reduce rather than amplify the response of the climate system to external forcing such as that from increasing atmospheric CO2.Looking at thermometer placement and heat in the infrared « Watts Up With That?
...I’ve been saying for some time that the MMTS electronic thermometer phased in by NOAA since the mid 1980’s has been picking up heat from buildings due to cable trenching issues placing them closer to buildings.SHEPHERDS, DAY ONE: “Step on the grass. Shoot a deer. Dig for oil. NOW!” « Bowing Down
How do you describe the buzz of 3500 pastors from around the world all gathering together in one place?John F. MacArthur: Information from Answers.com
...
[John MacArthur]
# Cal Tech scientist says global warming is on the same level as extra terrestrial beings.
# “Consensus” science is not science. Skepticism is the brother of true science.
# Legitimate science sees a correlation between sun spots and climate change. Warming is not produced by man; it’s produced by the sun.
# Vote for warming! It’s much better than cooling in many ways!
John F. MacArthur, Jr. (born June 19, 1939 in Los Angeles, California) is a United States Reformed evangelical writer and minister, noted for his radio program entitled Grace to You and as the editor of the Gold Medallion Book Award winning MacArthur Study Bible.[1] MacArthur is a fifth-generation pastor, a popular author and conference speaker...Opening Session – John MacArthur
11:18 In closing his session, Dr. MacArthur switched from discussing Creation to discussing the great “uncreation” of the world described in 2 Peter 3. In so doing, he specifically focused on how silly and unnecessary it is for evangelicals to jump on the environmentalism bandwagon.
11:20 Evangelicalism’s eagerness to embrace global warming and other environmentalist agenda items is a lost cause.
Posts
1 comment:
question about John MacArthur of GTY and his comment that the sun or solar flares cause increased CO2 and mans contribution is negligible.
he says he quotes a caltech study or researcher? was said about the same time he said concensus science is NOT science.
Im trying to find out if there is credibility to the claim by MacArthur that plausible work shows excess CO2 on the earth is the result of the sun heating up the oceans, mans input is minimal
Post a Comment