Saturday, March 28, 2009

PrairiePundit: The sea level rise scam
Remember that when Greenland was green it was not underwater. That fact flies in the face of the scare mongering about the melting ice cap. It appears to me that the "climate change" lobby is trying to frighten people into making an exorbitant investment in a scheme that will let left wing control freaks take charge of the world economy and screw it up worse than the communist did their own.
Andrew Kenny - Superstition, not science, feeds top folly of our age
Man-made global warming, the notion that mankind is changing the world's climate in a dangerous way, never had much grounding in science. It has now departed from proper science altogether and become a millennial religion of rich people in rich countries.

We can expect the well-funded Jeremiahs of climate change to produce apocalyptic warnings of disaster (sea levels rising by metres, disappearing ice caps and other such nonsense) before the Copenhagen climate negotiations in December, where the faithful hope to persuade governments to damage their economies with foolish efforts to reduce greenhouse emissions.

There is overwhelming scientific evidence that the slight warming of the 20th century was perfectly natural - no different from previous natural warming periods. It had little, if anything, to do with rising levels of carbon dioxide (CO2).
More alarmist BS by from Richard Gray: "Species to be relocated as rivers dry up" - Telegraph
Rivers during the summer could have up to 80 per cent less water in them by the middle of this century, leaving the country facing widespread drought, according to a new government report to be published this week.
...
"Traditional two-year droughts we have had in the past could easily turn into three- and four-year droughts," said Mr Bishop. "It is not a linear erosion of our resources between now and 2050, but it becomes particularly acute after 2030."
During the intense alleged droughts, won't carbon dioxide also cause simultaneous intense flooding in the same areas?

No comments: