The Associated Press: Congress weighs far-reaching global warming [swindle] bill

The fallout from global warming, while subtle now, could eventually be even more dire.
...
Then there is the question whether the public will have the appetite to accept higher energy prices for a benefit that will not be seen for many years. Climate change ranks low on many voters' priority lists.

Every year since 2001 has been among the 10 warmest years on record. Sea ice in the Arctic and glaciers worldwide are melting.

But the problems are not as apparent as they were in the 1970s, or even the early 1990s, when Congress addressed acid rain and depletion of the ozone layer.

"If carbon dioxide were brown, we wouldn't have the same problem," said Gus Speth, who organized the Natural Resources Defense Council in 1970. "But it's a subtle issue. ... The problems are chronic not acute, and it is largely invisible to people unless they're reading the newspaper or checking the glaciers or going to the South Pole."

IPCC Scientist says UN's function 'is to provide an appearance of scientific justification for political policies'

Of course the next IPCC report has to be delayed.

The IPCC is the InterGOVERNMENTal Panel on Climate Change. Governments are political bodies. And the IPCC’s function is – and always has been – to provide an appearance of scientific justification for political policies.

That appearance becomes progressively more difficult to sustain with each year the globe fails to warm. [Via Climate Depot]

Warming alarmists cry wolf | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

Sum up: the science shows that wolves are suffering from inbreeding more than climate change, and from unusual cold rather than unusual heat. But try telling that to a professional liar global warming alarmist.

(Thanks to reader Neil.)