Climate Change [Scam] Needs Financial Stimulus

According to WWF calculations, each industrialized country would have to commit to a share of the total amount of €145 billion ($US 196 billion) that is needed annually by 2020 to fund adaptation and mitigation in developing countries. This amount consists of €100 billion ($US 135 billion) for mitigation – including measures to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation –plus €40 billion ($US 54 billion) and €5 billion for an insurance and risk mechanism.

Chairman Chu - Rationalzing false rationing « The Air Vent

...There it is right there. Did you read that. This is a flat lie put right in front of you . We’re going to power our vehicles with our farms. I’ve done the calculations here a number of times and apparently am going to have to do them again. Don’t be fooled people, check the numbers. There isn’t enough land to pull this off becasue the photosynthetic conversion of sunlight has terrible efficiency. The biomass from the farms is currently used to replenish soils and feed people, cutting back on either of those is idiocy by itself. But Chu doesn’t care.

Biofuel does not work, Chu knows it. After all, before he sold his scientific credentials to become a far left politician, he was a leading scientist. Why then is he selling the American public these deliberately false hopes. Chu, you are a liar, a fraud and I don’t mind telling you such. I have a lot of readers which see my normal tone, even with some of the crazy people who post here. However this man deserves our contempt and I’m not one to mince words about it.

The Cost of [the] Global Warming [Fraud]: A Story in Pictures » The Foundry

...And what should be the final nail in the coffin: All this economic pain is for very little, if any, environmental gain. Analysis by the Environmental Protection Agency concludes that if the U.S. reduces CO2 emissions 60 percent by 2050, it will reduce global temperature by 0.1 to 0.2 degree Centigrade by 2095. A multi–lateral approach wouldn’t fare much better. Why? Well, there’s a lot of reasons. After all, the science behind global warming is anything but conclusive, but one reason could be how small man’s contribution to carbon dioxide emissions is.