Ducking the Point | Climate Skeptic

The argument is not that the greenhouse gas effect of CO2 doesn’t exist. The argument is that the climate models built on the rickety foundation of substantial positive feedbacks are overestimating future warming by a factor of 3 or more. The difference matters substantially to public policy. Based on neutral to negative feedback, warming over the next century will be 1-1.5C. According to Joe Romm, it will be as much as 8C (15F). There is a pretty big difference in the magnitude of the effort justified by one degree vs. eight.

Gore Mouthing-Off About Make-Belive Madoffs — Climate Resistance: Challenging Climate Orthodoxy

This is climate politics. It pretends to be about saving the planet. But in reality, it is crass, petty, and self-interested.

Climate sceptics ought to take two messages from this.

First, it is clear that environmentalists are clutching at straws to make their case.

Second, that climate politics of this kind has achieved this level of prominence therefore cannot be blamed solely on climate activists. It cannot be argued that environmentalism has risen under its own steam. It’s momentum has been generated by a vacuum of ideas that all political parties suffer from. This is the issue that needs addressing.

Australian Climate Madness: Comment - the left-wing intelligentsia don't have a clue

So a previous solar minimum was enough to cause a mini-Ice Age, but this one will only drop temperatures a tenth of a degree? The logic is baffling.