G20: Little time wasted on the climate scam

In fact, Energy & Climate Change Secretary Ed Miliband was the only person who spoke about environment at the G20 summit and then only because his title somewhat dictated the press questioning. He spoke of low carbon jobs and personal energy efficiency… in other words he trotted out the same old ‘stuff’ - whilst the news tickers were streaming announcements that additional money for this and more loan funds for that have been agreed upon...

Got Consistency? - Chris Horner - Planet Gore on National Review Online

This really is getting confusing. Mere lawyers like Pres. Obama are qualified to attain informed judgment on global warming. Other lawyers — like the UK High Court judge, me, you name 'em — if they disagree with the warmist consensus, . . . well, no, they do not possess the relevant background necessary to achieve climate enlightenment. Economists? Heck no — the notion is "laughable" says Cimate Progress. Er, unless you mean that guy who's the "UN's chief climate scientist." Then, ah . . . why, yes, yes indeed! Don't even get me started on the faith leaders (hey look, Pat Robertson's no longer crazy — he agrees with Al Sharpton!), be they the Goracle or otherwise...

Are skeptics of climate consensus anti-science? | CEJournal

Without scientists who are willing to challenge orthodoxy, science would not make such great leaps of discovery. So when critics like Romm describe Dyson as being anti-scientific because of his skepticism, they betray a fundamental lack of understanding of how science actually works. Science needs skeptics with sharp axes to take a crack at consensus — even climate science.