Twitter / Nathan Mueller

Tomorrow = Yet another class on the science of climate change ... how many times have I learned about energy balance and the carbon cycle???

To Cap and to Trade - Contact your local idiot « The Air Vent

So now we’ll have the policy that our electric bills won’t go up but our taxes have to. Back door energy bills that we can’t see, great idea guys.

Check out the braintrust: Alarmist Romm is one of the 8 “most influential energy and environmental policymakers in the Obama era”

Inside, they list Lisa Jackson, Barbara Boxer, Lisa Murkowski, Steven Chu, Al Gore, Henry Waxman, Carol Browner, and me.

Yale Daily News - Q&A | Climate [fraudster Pachauri] extends vision to Yale

Q: What would you say to the skeptics of climate change?

A: Well, look at the work of the IPCC. These are thousands of scientists who have functioned in a transparent, objective manner. Everything that is assessed by the IPCC, every draft at every stage is peer-reviewed. … It’s an extremely objective, knowledge-driven process. It involves the best experts and scientists from all over the world. If their assessment doesn’t carry any weight and doesn’t have the imprint of truth, then I’d like to know what does. Essentially, I think the skeptics have to read the writing on the wall. They must understand the foundations on which the assessment of the IPCC are built and go along by accepting reality. But we also know that throughout history, whenever new areas of knowledge have emerged, there have been skeptics who denied the truth until they were blue in the face, and there will be some who will do that with climate change as well. But I’m happy to say their numbers are dwindling, although their voices are not getting any softer. So I think in a democracy, in a world where there is freedom of expression, you will always have some people who question even what is so obvious and so apparent.