Online Poll: Lower Gas Prices Beat Lower Greenhouse Gases
May 28--WASHINGTON -- Asked to choose between lower gasoline prices and reduced greenhouse-gas emissions from gasoline, 66 percent of Americans in a new online survey chose lower gas prices and the rest said that reducing the emissions that cause climate change was more important.The American Spectator : Chris Horner : Dragon Lady
The survey also found that 56 percent of Americans think that the federal government should stop subsidizing ethanol production because they're afraid that it boosts food prices, while the rest said that the subsidies should continue. When they were asked to choose between government subsidies for food crops or for ethanol, 82 percent chose food and the rest chose ethanol.
By now you've surely seen the story, splashed by Drudge, of Nancy Pelosi letting a certain nasty little kitten out of the bag with "Every aspect of our lives must be subject to inventory" in the fight against Man-made global warming. In China, no less, so talk about preaching to the choir.YouTube - Learn2Discern - Steven Chu's Wild Warning
...
Anyway, what you may not have seen yet is the quite relevant Chapter 6 in Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Uses Threats, Fraud and Deception to Keep You Misinformed, "Big Government: How Government, Politicians, and Alarmists Abuse Power in the Pursuit of Power". It is there that I detail the greens' wistful descriptions of China as the kind of system that's necessary to make their stalled agenda reality.
Which if you think about it is pretty much what Pelosi was really saying.
Steven Chu issued what he called a very scary warning about rising sea levels, due to global warming. According to Chu, quote: lots of area in Florida will go under. -End of quote. But is that true?Nebraska Farm Bureau opposes climate change bill
Nebraska Farm Bureau strongly opposes the American Clean Energy and Security Act (H.R. 2454), which would cap the amount of carbon-based emissions from certain sectors of the U.S. economy, Keith Olsen, president of Nebraska Farm Bureau said May 21.
“What this means for agriculture is higher input cost on the farm or ranch. While most businesses are able to pass these increases off to consumers, farmers and ranchers are unable to do that and would simply take the hit,” Olsen said. “This piece of climate change legislation ignores the complex needs of Nebraska’s very diverse agricultural industry.”
1 comment:
If they told the truth about ethanol, no one would support it.
In fact there are a lot of things that if they told the truth about would collapse.
In fact if the media would do their job ...
Post a Comment