Environment » Blog Archive » That will be $115 bln for clean energy, please | Blogs |

Yikes. Seems it ain’t easy, or at least ain’t cheap, being green.

It will cost California some $115 billion for (pretty much) hitting 33 percent renewable energy by 2020. That’s more than twice the price tag of sticking with a goal of 20 percent. The difference, according to a long-delayed report issued today by the state’s Public Utilities Commission is due to the speed of building fast. There are all sorts of other problems outlined in exquisite detail. It’s all quite handy for those trying to get a sense of just what needs to be done to go green. A lot, it seems.

The International Conference on Climate Change - Part III - Skanderbeg’s blog - RedState

Your humble correspondent was in Washington last week to cover the most recent (Third) International Conference on Climate Change, which was organized by the Heartland Institute.

C3: Have Climate Models Accurately Predicted Atmospheric Humdity, The Key To Water Vapor "Positive" Feedback?

Read here. Nope. Increasing water vapor is absolutely critical to the global warming theory as it is the positive feedback loop that CO2 emissions hypothetically cause. Thus, climate models predict higher humidity. Actual data shows the atmosphere being less humid - NO POSITIVE FEEDBACK! Surprised? (If so, go here and re-read all our previous postings about climate models' miserable record of predictions. You'll never be surprised by climate model failure again.)