Greenpeace Opposes Waxman-Markey | Greenpeace USA
Washington, D.C., United States — In advance of tomorrow’s vote on the American Clean Energy and Security Act in the House of Representatives, Greenpeace USA Deputy Campaigns Director Carroll Muffett issued the following statement:Don Surber » Blog Archive » Enviros hopped to conclusions about mutated frogs
"Since the Waxman-Markey bill left the Energy and Commerce committee, yet another fleet of industry lobbysists has weakened the bill even more, and further widened the gap between what Waxman-Markey does and what science demands. As a result, Greenpeace opposes this bill in its current form. We are calling upon Congress to vote against this bill unless substantial measures are taken to strengthen it. Despite President Obama’s assurance that he would enact strong, science-based legislation, we are now watching him put his full support behind a bill that chooses politics over science, elevates industry interests over national interest, and shows the significant limitations of what this Congress believes is possible.
BBC 2002: “Pollution causing massive frog mutation!”15 Reasons to Oppose Climate Bill
BBC 2009: “The deformed frogs are actually victims of the predatory habits of dragonfly nymphs, which eat the legs of tadpoles. “
Our bad.
Sorry about that.
Need a reason to oppose the Waxman-Markey "cap and tax" bill, which will be voted on in the House later this afternoon? Here are 15 reasons, provided by the good folks at the RSC. Democrats should find several of these reasons hard to ignore.
No comments:
Post a Comment