Thomas Fuller: Next generation questions for global warming

There is a new generation of skeptical arguments advanced against the theory of anthropogenic global warming. I hope they win--not because I am on their side, but because I want very much for the Earth not to face a serious threat--we have enough of them already. So far, it appears to me that this new generation of counter claims is not receiving individual attention, but is rather being classed in with earlier skeptical arguments.

So let me try and articulate some of them here and ask for a response.

Jennifer Marohasy » Worrying About Small Changes



Don Surber » Blog Archive » Al Gore’s hockey stick is found

As solar activity drops and with it all the “proof” of Al Gore’s traveling salvation medical show drops with it, there has been a sudden surge in global warming sleptics.

Or as Al Gore calls us, “global warming deniers” — a cute way of calling us Nazis.

Bless her heart, Kimberley Strassel of the Wall Street Journal has kept track of the sharp — hockey stick — uptick in good old healthy and scienctific skepticism on claims that driving 15 miles per gallon wiill bring tidal waves, earthquakes and cause polar bears to drown.
...
The only thing settled is that the junk science of this climatic phrenology has so spooked people that the socialists are having their way with the ridiculous cap-and-trade tax.

What Al Gore meant when if we wait for proof it will be too late is quick, pass it before anyone notices my degree is in government, not science.

We’re Galileo. He’s Pope Urban VIII.