Instapundit » Blog Archive
PERFORMANCE REVIEW: Speaker Pelosi unfavorables: Jan 37% June 57%.Warming millions good, sceptics’ thousands bad | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
Which makes Ward a monumental hypocrite.He complains that a few hundred thousand dollars from Big Oil corrupts debate, but says nothing about the more than $20 million his own university gets from Big Warming.Gasssing on about a deal | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
Why did Alberici not mention this?
So here’s the deal for the ABC. Debate the science, but if you must claim that the funding corrupts, at least admit which side gets the most of it.
Tom Switzer is right to doubt there will be much a deal at the Copenhagen summit on global warming at the end of the year:Instapundit » Blog Archive
NANOTECHNOLOGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE: The big point is that — unlike many other proposed remedies — nanotechnology is worth developing ASAP regardless of what happens with the climate. Plus, a warning: “Be careful, though: while natural climate variability is not an existential risk — we do fine in steaming jungles and have lived through ice ages — a Weather Machine run by the same people who ran our financial system recently could be a very dangerous toy.”
No comments:
Post a Comment