Is the Climate Science Debate Over? No, It’s Just Getting Very, Very Interesting (with welcome news for mankind) — MasterResource
Reports of the death of climate skepticism have been greatly exaggerated. Not only is the climate science debate [not] “over,” it is just starting to get interesting. All the basic issues–detection, attribution, and sensitivity–are unsettled and more so today than at any time in the past decade.RedStateEclectic : Warming up to cold cash.
...Even as seasonal low temperature records are being neared or broken across the country, these charlatans continue to peddle their snake oil with great urgency. The reason for this urgency is that if they fail to enact their massive taxation scheme called "cap and trade", they will not only lose what will amount to trillions of dollars picked from the public pocket, but they will lose their chance to claim victory over global climate change when the cooling that is happening anyway becomes undeniably manifest.Three Ways Obama Wins Republicans on Climate Change : Red, Green, and Blue
They are petty scam artists of the Ponzian ilk.
If Jon Stewart is snoozing, we know that the rest of America - a goodly percentage of which is far across the spectrum from Stewart and outwardly hostile to climate change arguments - is tuned all the way out. That is partly because climate change, energy and the environment still are considered Birkenstock and granola issues.Emissions scheme 'extra stress' for farmers - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
...
The administration has the right allies to rescue climate change from consignment to the eco-liberal scrap heap. Bill O’Reilly might not be buying it, but credible voices on the national security implications of energy reform are out there, ranging from former Senator Warner to a slew of retired Admirals and Generals, to long-time security apparatchiks like Jim Woolsey. Its a steep climb, but this shift in tone is a good start.
If Obama could make this a hardcore national security issue it would be galvanizing. The drawback for the White House is that this opens up the question of domestic drilling and it remains an open question whether Obama is willing to compromise there. He should…if he wants this badly enough.
A biologist and climate change expert says it is becoming increasingly difficult for farmers to adapt to climate change, and being included in an emissions trading scheme will be of little benefit.
Dr Jennifer Marohasy will today speak at a grains forum organised by the South Australia Farmers Federation.
1 comment:
Dr Jennifer Marohasy will today speak at a grains forum organised by the South Australia Farmers Federation.
Dr J - that's my girl. A grass root campaign is the way to go here in Calif. How much support is there for a repeal of the Global Warming solutions act? A lot I bet. And Jen is showing the way to prove it. So far the warmers have had their way with the conferences, concerts, symposiums, and blanket credulous coverages by fauning press.
A townhall meeting featuring a "real climate debate - finally" would draw the real people out in force, and send an icy finger down the spine of politicians who talk tough love on the environment behind closed doors at the statehouse, but lose that candor and courage when out in the real world.
Let them beware.
Post a Comment