It's the pace, not the total, that matters most in global warming

If temperatures rose (again) by 2 degrees or more over a longer period of time, both humans and wildlife would have time to adjust--and we've done so repeatedly. But cramming that rise into a timespan of a century or less would cause unnecessary stress. We probably would not lose polar bears--they've survived more dramatic climate shifts in the past. But we might lose other 'charismatic megafauna' such as cheetahs, rhinos and other species that we've already stressed with our other profligate habits.

Global cooling hits Al Gore's home - Telegraph

Nashville, the home of leading global warming prophet Al Gore, has enjoyed the coolest July 21 on record, observes Christopher Booker.

The Reference Frame: Greenland not exceptionally warm now

No unprecedented recent warming is found. For example, they find that the 1919-1932 warming was 1.33 times greater than the 1994-2007 warming.