Nature of Consensus – Snowmen II « the Air Vent

I fully agree that climate scientists need to do a better job and have even seen evidence fraud but climatologists can rest assured that none of them will ever see real punishment by a government seeking ever more power and money. Several of them will, however, loose their fame in time as fair minded scientists see the endless holes in their work. It’s my firm belief that Michael Mann will not be known for predicting past temperatures from proxy data in 30 years but rather as ex-influential scientist who prolifically wrote bad math for reasons not stated. It may not be entirely climatology’s fault that the certainty and consensus of global warming has been obviously exaggerated because the government has implemented a clear system of rewards for certain scientific conclusions and apparently in this case —- punishment for anything less.

Why GE wants to raise the cost of electricity « Green Hell Blog

So how much of your time at home do you really want to spend monitoring your family’s electricity usage?

Wonk Room » Like A Pig To The Trough, Washington Post’s George Will Returns To Climate Denial

Fred Hiatt’s continued publication of George Will’s alternate-universe diatribes is a blot on the Washington Post’s reputation.

Daily Pundit » Can We Put Chu Underwater For A While?

So this greenhog doofus from my own nabe, with no evidence whatsoever, prognosticates an even worse future than the dire bullshit pushed by the hysterics at the IPCC, and from there deduces that three Bay Area airports might be underwater a hundred years from now.

Well, sound the f*cking claxons. Obviously, we’re all doomed, and need to immediately destroy our economy in order to prevent such unthinkable outcomes.

How stupid do these people think we are?