North Carolina to Ban Mountaintop Wind? - Green Inc. Blog - NYTimes.com
A furious battle over the aesthetics of wind energy has erupted in North Carolina, where lawmakers are weighing a bill that would bar giant turbines from the state’s scenic western ridgelines.Welfare for mad scientists? AMS endorses federal funding of geoengineering « Green Hell Blog
The American Meteorological Society this week endorsed federal funding of geoengineering — that is, the Society believes that taxpayers should support surplus, unemployable, over-educated madmen willing to research how best to blot out the sun and implement other bizarre schemes in hopes of slowing climate change. Our only question is where the giant rubber-room research facility will be constructed.Hot Air » Blog Archive » Yet another poll shows Obama in trouble
People have seen Obama’s economic policies up close for the first time, and they don’t like them. As Obama tries to push his radical agenda on health care and energy through Capitol Hill, members of Congress will be looking at those numbers and balking more often. Obama hopes to change the trajectory of the numbers with a prime-time presser and a flood of media appearances this week, but clearly the American electorate has stopped paying attention to the campaign and focused on results — and they’ve found Obama wanting thus far.
Posts
1 comment:
"..aesthetics of wind energy.." as soon as windpower becomes the source of electricity, the greenies can use this as a new argument to blame electrical appliances for destroying earth's beauty indirectly via windmills.
No matter what new source of energy is developed, they will always find eco-problems and eventually be against it. The only energy the greens allow us to have eventually will be MUSCLE ENERGY. But muscle energy must not come from any other food than vegetables, which in turn must be farmed and harvested with muscle energy, NOT tractors. A return to the middle ages - no development stage further - is what they REALLY want.
Post a Comment