YouTube - Rush Limbaugh on global warming

As runaway suppositions go, the spectral threat of global warming has got to be the Granddaddy of them all. Based only upon a highly subjective and fluid computer model constructed solely of unproved and insupportable data ("junk science"), the world has once more been thrust into an environmental "crisis" without even a shred of scientific proof.

Political scientists and scientific politicians - Blogs - The Yorker

Thomas Jefferson once said that, “Reason and free inquiry are the only effectual agents against error.” And so, with that quote in mind, and the understanding that scientific theories must be falsifiable, the Freedom Society is hosting ‘Climate Week’, a five-day event from the 26th to 30th October at the University of York.

The week will question the politics and ethics of climate change science. Here at the Freedom Society, we do not know if anthropogenic climate change is occurring or not, but in order for us to draw a conclusion – especially as non-scientists – it is vital that the science be liberal, objective and untainted by political pressure.

[Did we say we needed $170 billion in annual climate swindle money?  We meant eleventy-zillion dollars]

The UNFCCC has estimated annual global costs of adapting to climate change to be $40 billion to $170 billion, or the cost of about three Olympic Games a year.

But the report’s authors warn that these estimates were produced too quickly and did not include key sectors, such as energy, manufacturing, retailing, mining, tourism and ecosystems.