India Returns to Hardline Stance on Climate Change Talks - Environmental Capital - WSJ

With less than 50 days before the Copenhagen summit, it looks increasingly likely that the long-awaited confab will be the chronicle of a death foretold. Whether that’s a disaster or a blessing in disguise, only time will tell.

Forget Global Warming, The Sky Really Could Fall | The Resilient Earth

No matter, Copenhagen will serve as notice to the citizens of the world that the IPCC and its climate change catastrophists will not go away quietly. We can look forward to more outbreaks of unsubstantiated claims, more proclamations of pending disaster, with every upward tick of the thermometer and every calving glacier. Skeptics, be forewarned—this fight is far from over. In climate science, as in politics, being in the wrong is no reason to give up—the climate scaremongers will be back.

Big chill at USU

Robert Davies, an assistant professor in physics at Utah State, told Salt Lake Tribune reporter Judy Fahys that Noel's pet expert Roy Spencer's analysis is "completely fringe." Davies opined that Spencer was brought in from Alabama by lawmakers as an excuse for blocking measures to address the threat.
...
*Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree "human activity is a significant contributing factor" in climate change.

Climate Change Skeptics Embrace ‘Freakonomics’ Sequel « The Washington Independent

One of those skeptics is Ross McKitrick, a professor at Canada’s University of Guelph whose research suggests that numbers suggesting a spike in global temperature are out of whack. He was hopeful that “SuperFreakonomics” could cut through the “groupthink and political correctness” and expose environmental journalists such as Joe Romm as dishonest activists who can’t accept criticism.

“He’s a former Clinton staffer who runs an attack blog funded by Soros money,” said McKitrick of Romm, whose ClimateProgress blog is a project of the Center for American Progress. “He’s only respected by people who approve of his inflammatory tactics and relentless politicization of the issue.”