Kerry-Boxer: Its Bite is Worse than its Bark — MasterResource
Much of the debate on Kerry-Boxer and Waxman-Markey has centered on the bills’ emission reduction targets. Meeting those targets would destroy millions of jobs, warn the Heritage Foundation, NBCC, and ACCF/NAM. The not-so-hidden fangs lurking in Sections 701 and 705 pose additional significant threats to the economy — and provide additional reasons to oppose such legislation.How not to measure temperature, part 91: find the official climate thermometer in this photo « Watts Up With That?
So the question in my mind is: how does the albedo of old tires compare to asphalt?Roger Pielke Jr.'s Blog: Mixed Messages
Then comes this rather embarrassing admission,How Copenhagen could threaten NZ’s very future « The Inquiring MindLord Stern, who said that he was not a strict vegetarian himself, was speaking on the eve of an all-parliamentary debate on climate change.He also explains that the magnitude of effort is enormous:
...
But, I thought it was a postage stamp per day?
Incidentally the question has to be asked of people who promote such idiocies, if oil is going to run out so we need to reduce use of fossil fuels and we severely constrict, if not eliminate, many herds of animal – the how the hell are we going to clothe ourselves without leather and wool and with little or no artificial textiles either.
...
[comment at The Times] Our empirical evidence suggests that the most likely cause of an untimely death might likely be from the policies and police of the self-appointed do-gooders who believe that their elitist status is a mandate to enslave humanity “for it’s own good.” The greatest murders throughout the history of mankind went about their “work” with the stated intention of “saving” humanity. It is a shame the rational people fail to understand history, a study that might prepare them for the next version of tyranny.
No comments:
Post a Comment