Stealth cap & trade: Obama aiding UN take over the world?
If it does create a government that wields the power to control the world’s economy, it will again be done without full transparency of the US citizens, and in the dark of night. While we tilt at windmills over health care and other sundry issues, the Senate will pass the climate change legislation, and lay the groundword for the US “leading” the way to int’l government… just as Lord Monckton states.American Thinker: Why the left isn't socialist
In the view of the left, capitalist enterprise is just one big smokin' pack of Camels. The insurance industry ("they want you to die"), big pharma ("profiting off of people's sickness), the banks (overpaid rascals), auto ("making cars that are killing the planet"). There is really no industry out there that is both successful and "OK." The OK-industries -- green, solar-driven windmills -- are all as wildly unsuccessful as Shen Te's tobacco shop, when she ran on "good" principles.Crap and Tax - A Lobotomy for the United States of America? - Kevin Klees, Engineer
Under the new socialism, we need those bad industries to generate wealth, so that we can pay for the good ones. So, the simple strategy is: Do whatever you have to do to keep capitalism alive, and then bleed it for everything you can.
Should we commit economic suicide because a “consensus” is sure that MOST of the (poorly measured) warming is VERY LIKELY caused by humans? One definition of MOST is “more than half”, and the UN’s own definition of VERY LIKELY is 90%, so the UN is stating that 51% * 90% = 45% of the (poorly measured) “warming” is caused by human activities. Should we perform a self-inflicted lobotomy to “solve” a problem that has a likely occurrence of 45% ?The Rest of Waxman–Markey: Caveat Emptor! — MasterResource
You should of course also know that the manufacturers of this “consensus” depend entirely on the propagation of the “consensus” for their livelihood i.e.: no consensus, no jobs.
About the only aspects of energy policy Waxman-Markey does not cover are the discovery and production of new supplies, and the encouragement of competitive markets for them. This energy bill is on close inspection an anti-energy bill. Caveat emptor!The Daily Clog » Geniuses Make Mistakes, Too: Boo-Boo Found in Kyoto Protocol
The explanation seemed sort of confusing for mere laypeople like ourselves, which we’d assume is why it took a team of 13 prominent scientific experts to realize that there was, indeed, a bit of an issue. Fortunately, they were a team of prominent scientific experts, so all will soon be right with the world. Huzzah, Science!RealClearPolitics - Irate and Independent
Americans are simply fed up:C3: Korean Temperature Records Reflect Large Urban Heat Bias That's Gone Uncorrected, Researchers Find
• A CNN poll last week suggests most no longer agree with Obama "on the issues that matter most to them."
...
What does all this portend? Very possibly a Ross Perot moment -- the emergence of someone with serious charts and serious language that angry Americans will see as more authentic than "hope and change."
Researchers find same urban heat bias problem in Korea that has contaminated all global temperature databases worldwide. This large warming bias has never been corrected by the major climate agencies, despite being a well documented phenomenon. As a result of these inaccurate temperature databases, climate models have been unable to accurately predict future climate conditions - a very expensive garbage in, garbage out occurrence.
No comments:
Post a Comment