Climate Change – the one sided debate « The Economic Voice

Peter Hitchens, like him or loathe him, does make a very cogent case for more considered debate on the subject and one of the things he brings up puzzles me. Why has the population of polar bears increased in the recent past, not declined as the climate change lobby would have you believe should have happened?

The climate change side say that right or wrong we should act ‘just in case’. But as the sceptics point out, this may divert time and energy away from the economic growth that would drag millions out of poverty and an early death.

Global Warming: Goofiness Coming to Chicago on Monday | Chicago Daily Observer

I guess the nutty environmental types haven't seen that the "science" behind all their passion is turning out to be as solid as a bowl of Jello on Mercury. If you have the good fortune of being in downtown Chicago on Monday (ha ha, I'll be in rural Pennsylvania), you can participate in the "March on Chicago's Climate Criminals". If you would like to, you can attend the "Mobilization Organization Meeting" on Sunday and afterward be treated to a free Vegan dinner - oh boy - yummy, yummy.

Climategate: how the ‘greatest scientific scandal of our generation’ got its name – Telegraph Blogs

...I totally agree with all those of you who groan that it’s too obvious or insufficiently witty (Mark Steyn’s Warmergate is better). It may even be that the latest name from the US is more apposite.

Climaquiddick, they’re calling it now. Why? Because the liberal media aren’t reporting it with the glee and enthusiasm and foaming self-righteousness they accorded Watergate. Instead, they’re giving it the grudging, embarrassed non-coverage the libtard MSM invariably does to a story they’d rather, ahem, drown.

If a scandal isn’t reported by the media, does that mean it never happened?

Father Earth, Algore sums it up best: “This is not a political issue, or a scientific issue or a psychological issue – it’s a moral issue. If anything it’s actually a spiritual issue.” There you have it. If you don’t agree with their unscientific ‘consensus’ then you’re a really stupid, bad and immoral person. The left has spoken and the media agrees. Case closed.