EPA Censorship of Video Raises New Questions about Suppression of Science

Washington, D.C.– Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson should explain her agency’s efforts to silence two employees who used a video posted on YouTube to question the value of a carbon trading system currently being considered in Congress, Reps. Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., and Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., said in a letter to Jackson.
“This is another example of the EPA playing dirty to get green,” said Sensenbrenner, ranking Republican on the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming.

Obama to Vote ‘Present’ in Copenhagen? - Greg Pollowitz - Planet Gore on National Review Online

We are the change we have been waiting for, at some later date to be determined

The Future Of Climate Alarmism Is Bogus Statistics « JoNova

The organizations that measure temperature are in government control. No private group has an interest in measuring global temperatures over the decades required. The government organizations that measure temperatures will tend to produce the answers the government needs. Anyone with a passion to find the adjustments that cool the statistics will feel like they wade through mud uphill; all that hard work and yet no one will get excited. Rewards will be muted. People who do not comply with the unspoken culture will be effectively forced out of those organizations—their careers will stall, or they won’t be hired in the first place if they don’t have the right “attitude”. The staff will self select. Only true believers, for whom the ends justify the means, and those with a sufficiently flexible attitude to truth, will survive and thrive in those organizations.

Think a future of systematic cheating of temperature data to justify taxes, profits, and world government is too cynical? It’s already started...

India defends its climate-change strategy while calling for room to develop -- latimes.com

Both [China and India] have also resisted, however, arguing that it's unfair for wealthy nations that degraded the environment for centuries to now deny poor countries the opportunity to get ahead.

But if wind and sun are really such great, cost-effective energy sources, why don't these countries use them to "get ahead"?