How Wide-Spread Is The Damage? - Transterrestrial Musings

I wonder how long it will be before we reach the tipping point at which no one will admit to having been fooled by this nonsense? After the war, it was hard to find a Frenchman who wasn’t in the resistance.

Germans tried to warn us of Climate Fraud - Dennis Avery

But Der Speigel, the German news magazine, tried to blow the whistle on this climate fraud more than two years ago. In May of 2007, it published a story titled, “Not the End of the World As We Know It.” The story pointed out that Svente Arrhenius, the Swedish chemist who first posited the Greenhouse, had seen global warming as a good thing, with “better climates” potentially making poor harvests and famine a thing of the past.

Der Spiegel noted how previous cold periods—including the Little Ice Age that began in 1300—were too cold for grain to mature properly. In Germany, thousands of mountain villages and huge tracts of farmland were abandoned due to the cold.

Climategate: How it affects the globe

Their real agenda is not Gobal Warming or a better environment. Environmentalists real agenda is power. More money and more power. Put more regulation on evil corporations. So much regulation that they cannot compete. Then, the economy goes into the toilet and Socialism is installed when everyone is hurting. It is so typical it is cliche. The real environmentalist agenda is Socialistic. More government, more regulation, more, more, more.

The new information out of CRU just shows what should be done. Scrap Copenhagen and Scrap Cap-and-Trade and move on.

Legislation based on fraud still has a chance « JoNova

News: If Hockey wins tomorrow and becomes leader of the Opposition, he will allow a conscience vote. This means only seven senators need to vote for the huge ETS package and it would still get in.

Tony Abbot is now the best chance there is to delay this legislation. Abbott vs Hockey tomorrow.

Leaked climate change emails 'won't bias UN global warning body' says chairman - Telegraph

The leaked emails from the University of East Anglia will not affect the UN's advice on global warning, said Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the UN's climate change body.
...
Mr Pachauri said the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) received contributions from scientists worldwide and had a rigorous peer review system which ensured a balanced view.

"The processes in the IPCC are so robust, so inclusive, that even if an author or two has a particular bias it is completely unlikely that bias will find its way into the IPCC report," he told The Guardian.
...
Mr Pachauri said: "Every single comment that an expert reviewer provides has to be answered either by acceptance of the comment, or if it is not accepted, the reasons have to be clearly specified.

"So I think it is a very transparent, a very comprehensive process which insures that even if someone wants to leave out a piece of peer reviewed literature there is virtually no possibility of that happening."