In case you missed it: Skeptics Handbook II! Global Bullies Want Your Money « JoNova

It’s unthinkable. Big Government has spent $79 billion on the climate industry, 3000 times more than Big Oil. Leading climate scientists won’t debate in public and won’t provide their data. What do they hide? When faced with freedom-of-information requests they say they’ve “lost” the original global temperature records. Thousands of scientists are rising in protest against the scare campaign. Meanwhile $126 billion turned over in carbon markets in 2008 and bankers get set to make billions.

Al Gore Wishes He Never Invented The Internet - Minnesotans For Global Warming

The Global Warming Extremists had a good thing going for a while. All it took was one U.N. entity, a few scientists, a few scientific journals, one chart based on one tree, one politician and the main stream media, and Voilà! you have a worldwide crisis that requires a worldwide tax and a worldwide government. But all it took to bring it down was one post on one little blog. Even the New York Times is talking about it.

NC Media Watch: CRU E-mails now in search engine

Thanks to Al Gore we have the Internet to bring about the destruction of his global warming hoax.

ClimateGate emails provide unwanted scrutiny of climate scientists

Tom Wigley, a senior scientist in the Climate and Global Dynamics Division at NCAR, felt though that they could deal with Saiers by getting him removed from the AGU. “If you think that Saiers is in the greenhouse skeptics camp, then, if we can find documentary evidence of this, we could go through official AGU channels to get him ousted.”

The Migrant Mind: CRU hacked emails and Peer Review Corruption

62 mb of data is 62 books worth of information, a book being about 1 meg worth of writing.  [How did Nate Silver read all of those books so fast?]
...
NOPE, skeptics need to try to publish because they won't be allowed to. And then when they are denied access to publishing, they are then criticized for not publishing. Phil Jones even went so far as to try to talk to an editor about not publishing anything skeptical. This isn't how science is supposed to work.