Wednesday, November 04, 2009

What are we really arguing about when we argue about climate change? | Environment | guardian.co.uk
Members of the public are drifting into the climate change sceptic camp in recent months and years. How do we stem the flow?
...
The phrase 'the science is settled' is regularly used by politicians arguing for meaningful action on climate change. To the majority of the world's scientists, global warming is a clear and present danger and those who deny it, or argue that its effects will limited or benign, are dangerous lunatics. Nevertheless, an increasing numbers of voters, particularly in the US and the UK, have drifted into the sceptic camp in recent months and years.
...
Why, when the tone of urgency from mainstream scientists is getting ever clearer and the research results more worrying by the week, is the sceptic case in ascendancy?

No comments: