YouTube - SuperFreaks Question Man-Made Global Warming On Charlie Rose
DUBNER: Can I give one more example of the law of unintended consequences? The efforts to clean up the air in general and get heavy particulate pollution out of the air. All the sulfur, all the acid rain from coal plants and so on, in the 1970s, '80s, and '90s.Carbon [Swindle] Traders Adjust to New Copenhagen Expectations
It's now thought -- there are new studies, NASA, a bunch of scientists have been doing this -- it's now thought that removing the particles from the atmosphere is what's led to the warming, in large part.
With it now practically a given that Copenhagen will yield no global climate deal, carbon traders say that a final agreement in 2010 is crucial to the vitality of the carbon offset sector.Trouble in Green Paradise: Wind Farm Scams
Companies that have invested in carbon offset projects in anticipation of a climate deal being struck may end up affected by the future value of carbon permits, reports Economic Times.
Environmental activists like to tell us that the “green” movement is a benign, good-willed group of humanitarians who want humanity to be able to live in peace and harmony with our planet, while oil and coal companies are just a bunch of greedy white men in business suits who want to get rich and wreck the planet.Former Secretary Questions Need for Climate Change [Hoax Legislation]
Really? There’s no greed in the environmentalist movement? There’s no greed, scamming, and dishonesty going on there?
Think again. Think again for a long time.
Former Secretary of Agriculture John Block has his doubts about climate change legislation, now being discussed in Congress. He wonders if farmers will benefit or face burdensome regulations and increase costs. Block is concerned climate change legislation is another example of the federal government telling farmers what they can grow and how they can grow it.
No comments:
Post a Comment