Brilliant! A Worldwide One-Baby Policy to Stop AGW - Greg Pollowitz - Planet Gore on National Review Online

Francis doesn't say how such a worldwide ban would be implemented. If the U.N. can't get people around the world from butchering one another, I doubt they'll be any more successful at preventing them from copulating. Hmm . . . Well, forced sterilization has a fine ideological pedigree.

Kim Strassel: The EPA's Carbon Bomb Fizzles - WSJ.com

Bottom line: At least some congressional Democrats view this as breathing room, a further reason to not tackle a killer issue in the run-up to next year's election. Mr. Obama may emerge from Copehagen with some sort of "deal." But his real problem is getting Congress to act, and his EPA move may have just made that job harder.

All pain no gain: CFACT

* Failing Science: An outpouring of peer-reviewed studies, data, and skeptical scientists from around the world debunks the alleged "consensus" about man-made global warming. The Earth is well within natural climate variability, climate fear is being driven by unproven computer models, and it is preposterous for the EPA, White House, or Congress to call carbon dioxide a "pollutant."

[Climate scientists: The science is settled, but can we have another $60 billion?]: U.N. Bodies Want Up to $60 Billion to Monitor ... Everything - United Nations - FOXNews.com

An organization representing the grandest ambitions of climate scientists wants Western nations to spend at least $2.1 billion a year for the next five years — and as much as $60 billion overall during that period — to glean huge troves of still undiscovered climate information from the world's land, air and seas.

YouTube - James Hansen on David Letterman

David Letterman Warns The World: "We're all screwed!"
Letterman wonders why young people don't demonstrate for
the Global Warming Cause like they did during the Vietnam War.

CNSNews.com - Obama’s Top Climate Advisers Can’t Get Doomsday Story Straight While Testifying Before Same Committee on Same Day

(CNSNEws.com) - Which is it--6 feet or 3.5 feet?

Last week, White House science czar John Holdren told members of the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming that changes in global temperatures could mean a rise in sea levels of 6 feet or more in a century.

But Joan Lubchenco, administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, told the same committee on the same day that changes in global temperatures could mean a rise in sea levels of up to 3.5 feet in this century.

Same fears, different name? | spiked

Maurizio Morabito uncovers a 1974 CIA report showing that the ‘scientific consensus’ then was that the world was cooling.

Ocean acidification rates pose disaster for marine life, [bogus] study shows | Environment | guardian.co.uk

The world's oceans are becoming acidic at a faster rate than at any time in the last 55m years

Copenhagen climate summit: the time for talk has passed; Britain must act - Tim Yeo - Telegraph

The House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee recently visited Exeter to hear the latest climate projections from the Met Office. The scientists there told us categorically that the evidence is clear: climate change is happening and is being caused by the build-up of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere. As one of the first bodies in the world to gather weather data, the Met is one of Britain’s most respected scientific institutions. Its integrity is beyond question.

Flashback all the way to yesterday: Met Office denies petition pressure claim - UPI.com

One scientist, whose identity was not released, told The Times he was concerned his career could have suffered had he not signed the petition.

"The Met Office is a major employer of scientists and has long had a policy of only appointing and working with those who subscribe to their views on man-made global warming," the scientist said.