C3: New Peer-Reviewed Studies Totally Debunk Alarmist "Predictions" That Global Warming Causes Increases In Severe Weather Activity

Again proving that alarmist science is based on scientific untruths, speculation and hype, two new studies confirm what objective scientists have actually observed: recent past global warming is not causing an increase on severe storms.

A SHERLOCKIAN AT THE SCIENCE MUSEUM | More Intelligent Life

"There is nothing like first-hand evidence," wrote Conan Doyle in "A Study in Scarlet". It would be hard to view first-hand evidence in a cooler light than the Antarctic. "I am in a position," says Rapley, "to have seen the evidence that climate change is real, climate change is driven by humans, and it's serious enough that we need to do something about it."

Your View: Climate change issues are political, not scientific | delmarvanow.com | The Daily Times

The active agriculture in Greenland in the period from 800-1200 is one that the "man-made only" proponents ignore. They can't explain how a world population of about 300 million, burning only wood, could cause a 1 degree Celsius temperature rise. What caused it?

Letter to the Editor: Global warming is not science, it’s a scam - The Delaware County Daily Times : Serving Delaware County, PA(DelcoTimes.com)

President Obama always says, “Let me be clear.” So let me be clear. The elites love, depending on the weather at the moment, global warming (or climate change) for three convergent reasons. They get to grow government and enrich themselves while telling us that they are saving us from ourselves. Let me be clear: It should be about the science.

DAVID BRADLEY

More evidence CO2 not culprit | The Australian

Thus we have two geological examples and two satellite data studies pointing towards a lesser role of CO2 in global warming. This argument does not discount the reality of global warming during the past century or the potential consequences should it continue at the same rate, but it does suggest we need a broader framework in considering our response. The Copenhagen summit exposed intense political differences in proposals to manage global warming. Scientists are also not unanimous in claiming to understand the complex processes driving climate change and, more important, scientific studies do not unambiguously point to a single solution. Copenhagen will indeed prove to be a historic meeting if it ushers in more open-minded debate.

Michael Asten is a professorial fellow in the school of geosciences at Monash University, Melbourne.