Climategate - analysis by John Costella, Ph.D.

Welcome to my analysis of Climategate, the climate science scandal that has already eclipsed Watergate in terms of its global political ramifications.

Accept Defeat: The Neuroscience of Screwing Up | Magazine

Hah Hah Hah … You just explained Climagegate!!! LOL

Time to ban Greenpeace and give its riches to the poor | The SPPI Blog

If anyone sees the lying, Greenpeace version of this advert screened in Britain or any other nation where lies in advertising are unlawful, please let me know and I shall arrange for Greenpeace to be prosecuted.

Q & A Are Water Vapor Feedbacks From Added CO2 Well Understood? « Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr.

Thus, while Andrew Dessler is correct that water vapor feedback is required to significantly amplify the warming effect of added CO2, the water vapor feedback itself is not as well understood as he has indicated. Moreover, their conclusions indicate that any warming of the atmosphere, such as from black carbon (soot) would also have such a strong positive water vapor feedback. The Dessler analysis should be generalized to include all positive and negative radiative forcings.

Global Climate Scam » Clouds, Not CO2, Responsible for Climate Change

This 53-minute documentary offers an alternative explanation for climate change that is based upon a relationship between cosmic rays, the sun and the earth’s clouds.

American Thinker Blog: The lack of climate skeptics on PBS's 'Newshour'

What's missing from the PBS response is an outright explanation for its lack of skeptic scientist guests, and Ombudsman Getler's "danger of establishing a false equivalence" observation was a head-snapper for me because it mimics Society of Environmental Journalists board director Robert McClure's opinion in his October 16th reply to me at his web page