Heliogenic Climate Change: AGW clergy at EPA about to issue infallible papal decree
Even though they did no independent investigation into the science but relied solely on corrupt, politicized bodies like the IPCC and the NOAA CCSP, EPA is about to decree that the gas of life (there would be no plants and hence no animals without it) is a "dangerous pollutant". If only George Orwell were alive today. This is absolute insanity and is solely the blame of the fanatical imams of the AGW religion. Separation of church and state has ended in America.Nothing Personal | GlobalWarming.org
1. “They’ve” — implies someone from the group of skeptics they disdain was the one to pilfer and expose their messages. But CRU, Mann, and the rest of their cabal have no idea who exposed the records.Copenhagen climate summit: Climate Express sets off from Brussels - Telegraph
2. “stolen” — CRU, Mann, etc. cannot prove the records were extracted by an outside entity. They may have been exposed by a whistleblower. Those types are often celebrated as heroes when they scandals are revealed.
3. “personal” — We’ve already addressed that above and elsewhere.
4. “emails” — yes, and so much more. They don’t even want to talk about the corrupted source code, which a software engineer — who is not a climate skeptic — interviewed by BBC said was, let’s say, less than professional.
The train was packed with people utterly convinced of the science behind global warming and very scared about the consequences. Eco-warriors pressed up against over excited hacks and leading figures from the UN to hear inpromptu lectures on cutting greenhouse gases in carriages so full of hot air it was difficult to breath.Pajamas Media » Climategate: Obama’s Science Adviser Confirms the Scandal — Unintentionally
Now, I wouldn’t want to jump to any conclusions here, but it kind of looks to me like the “small group of scientists” caught out by Climategate are pretty much the same people who make up the vast and strong scientific consensus on global warming and write the official reports that the U.S. and other governments rely on to inform their policy decisions. I’m sure Dr. John P. Holdren, President Obama’s science adviser, has a plausible alternative explanation. He always does.
No comments:
Post a Comment