UK Telegraph: Pachauri mired in conflict | Australian Climate Madness

"Nothing of substance"? So I guess destroying data, refusing FOI requests, manipulating temperature records are all OK with the IPCC, are they? Sure.

We'll see - there will be more to this story, that's for certain.

Wikipedia: Don't trust it on climate | Australian Climate Madness

WUWT is now reporting that Connolley has been ditched by Wikipedia. However, are you starting to detect a theme here? Anything to do with the alleged "consensus" has to be doctored, tampered with, fiddled or manipulated in order to keep it afloat. Hardly the sign of "settled science".

Rudd to "try again for ETS tax" | Australian Climate Madness

At least the Daily Telegraph is calling it an ETS "tax" now!

Kevin Rudd, along with all the other world leaders at Copenhagen, believe they have the power to regulate the earth's climate. They genuinely believe that it will bow to their superior power, and keep its temperature rise below whatever figure they deem to be the right one.

William Connelley – Thoughtcop « Climate Sanity

This wasn’t just a hobby for Mr. Connelley, it must have been his full-time obsession.  He re-wrote over 5,000 Wikipedia articles!
...
The part about “This has been added to his article” may be the most revealing statement in this whole mess. Why? Because, as you can see from the quote about Connelley’s “Wikipedia Activity,” above, it does not appear there now. I guess the army of Wikipedia editors are still hard at work.

Darwin Zero Before and After « Watts Up With That?

Until someone can point out that mystery method, however, I maintain that the Darwin Zero record was adjusted manually, and that it is not a coincidence that it shows (highly improbable) warming.

The Copenhagen farce is glad tidings for all | Dominic Lawson - Times Online

After two weeks of increasingly ill-tempered negotiations, one of the European delegates at the Copenhagen summit “to save the planet” had clearly reached breaking point; or perhaps it was the ingratitude of the people he was trying to save that caused this negotiator to tell the BBC’s science correspondent, Susan Watts, that millions of Africans now “deserve” to be incinerated.

Watts was reporting a conversation she had had with an unnamed “European negotiator” after South Africa decided to join the quartet of America, India, China and Brazil in putting its name to a statement rejecting any binding emissions targets, and thus comprehensively sabotaging the entire conference. “South Africa has signed up to this!” the delegate told Watts. “They’re going to fry — and they’ll deserve it.”

Roger L. Simon » Copenhagen Wrap-up: “I have seen the future and it stinks!”

Yes, it’s comical, but it’s quite worrisome, if you examine the true game afoot. Copenhagen was intended as an important advance toward world governance. On the face of it, it’s a beautiful idea. When I was younger, I was highly attracted to it. But my up-close-and-personal encounters with the UN have turned that attraction to near revulsion. It’s very clear that under global government – because of its size and natural inefficiencies – accountability is nigh on to impossible, transparency nothing but a distant dream, very often not even desired. In short, it’s 1984. And COP15 was just that – legions staring at world leaders on Jumbotrons as they blathered platitudes, while negotiations were conducted behind closed doors. (That’s bad enough in our Congress, but on a global scale…?)

You could paint an unpretty picture of global warming advocates

The leaders, organisations, scientists and reporters that have contributed to or profited from this sorry state of affairs should get off the stage. Now. There is real work to be done--but you have disqualified yourselves from participation.