"What in the Hell Do They Think Is Causing It?": [As the global warming fraud collapses, Gore faces a handful of non-softball questions from Slate]
And yet the public pressure is building and I am optimistic that this climate-change legislation will pass the Senate. Sponsors say they have 60 votes, but we'll see when the roll is called.Contiguous United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
... I haven't read all the e-mails, but the most recent one is more than 10 years old. [This is not even close to true]
...What we're seeing is a set of changes worldwide that just make this discussion over 10-year-old e-mails kind of silly. The entire North Polar ice cap is disappearing before our very eyes. It's been the size of the continental United States for the last 3 million years and now 40 percent is gone and the rest of it is going. The mountain glaciers are going. We've had record storms, droughts, fires, and floods. There is an air of unreality in debating these arcane points when the world is changing in such dramatic ways right in front of our eyes because of global warming.
Q: What's your view on the medieval warm period and the charge that the East Anglia e-mails suggest data was manipulated to "contain" that anomaly?
A: I haven't read those e-mails in detail, but the larger point is that there are cyclical changes in the climate and they are fairly well-understood, and all of them are included in the scientific consensus. When you look at what has happened over the last few decades the natural fluctuations point in the opposite direction of what has actually occurred. When they run the models and plug in the man-made pollution, the correspondence is exact. Beyond that, the scale of natural fluctuations has now been far exceeded by the impact of man-made global warming.
...And when we see all these things happening on the Earth itself, what in the hell do they think is causing it? The scientists have long held that the evidence in their considered word is "unequivocal," which has been endorsed by every national academy of science in every major country in the entire world.
...
I'm not a scientist, so I'm not the best witness, but I have followed the debate for 40 years [but he said the science was already settled in 1992]. It was a somewhat harder case to make 30-40 years ago, but it was still clear. So many of the details have been filled in now, it's very hard to find a respectable argument contrary to the consensus on the main points about global warming. Some people don't want to hear that, but it's a fact.
Together, the 48 contiguous states and D.C. have an area of 3,119,884.69 square miles (8,080,464.25 km²).IJIS Web Site: Current size of the Arctic ice cap
The latest value : 10,897,500 km2 (December 8, 2009)
No comments:
Post a Comment