American Thinker Blog: Who's Watching the Climategate Gatekeepers?

Has Google invested heavily in "green" anti global warming technologies? Google has close ties with Al Gore and Obama. Anyone looking for information on Climategate is directed to links critical of Climategate and no suggestions for it.

Note: I just typed "climate" into my Google search box, and from a climate realist standpoint, the results are encouraging:


Tentative Prospects For US Climate Change [Hoax] Legislation - Science News - redOrbit

The chances of passing meaningful legislation dealing with the issue of global climate change are slim amid the current U.S. economic downturn and looming midterm congressional elections, experts say.

The Chilling Effect | cooling heated rhetoric on global warming » Liar, Liar, Glaciers On Fire

Climate science is likely to be — one day — a credible field based on rational reflection of credible data. But it’s not that today. More to the big point, though, is that one gets the feeling wheels are coming off a great juggernaut set in motion. It was either going to break through all adversaries and carry the day or it was going to break down, rust up, and die.

C3: The Lunacy of Ethanol: Proof That U.S. Politicians Could Care Less About CO2 Emissions

There are a multitude of good reasons why subsidizing ethanol production and mandating its use is plain craziness. The most important reason though, is the fact that a gallon of ethanol spews more CO2 than a gallon of gas (we should replace all ethanol with oil-based gas that comes from U.S. resources - "drill, baby, drill" policies). If the politicians and the EPA really felt CO2 was a harmful pollutant, and would endanger not only humans but the climate also, they would be morally be obligated to immediately kill the subsidies and mandates. Obviously, it's all about money and control, not reducing CO2 emissions.