Thursday, January 14, 2010

Consensus? What Consensus? « JoNova
How many scientists does it take to prove the debate is not over? More than 30,000 scientists have signed The Petition Project. More than 9,000 of them have PhDs (not that that proves anything about carbon, but it does prove something about the myth of “consensus”). The petition’s wording is unequivocal...
...
AGW says: Everyone knows the petition is bogus and filled with duplicate and fake names.

Skeptics say: Name 10 fakes.
It’s the Paint, Stupid! Bad paint jobs cause growing anomalies in global temperature data | CLIMATEGATE
Thanks to the research of analysts such as Anthony Watts it seems that the world, in the midst of the worst winter in 30 years, has been given further good cause to doubt climatologists’ findings, knowing there is the distinct possibility that significant measurement bias has crept in with this paint issue.
The Blackboard » Shocking Revelation: Correcting Projections After Observing Data Results in Better Agreement.

No comments: