EPA Response to Comments « Climate Audit

My submission raised issues with the peer review process at IPCC and elsewhere – that do not appear to have been dealt with in Volume 11. Questions about whether EPA had properly ensured that IPCC peer review processes met the statutory standards required for EPA reliance and whether EPA had carried out the required due diligence to ensure that the peer review processes met those standards.

The various IPCC-gates since the publication of the EPA responses make these questions even more pertinent today – and the failure of EPA responses to respond to these issues more apparent.

IPCC’s latest source: what some blokes told some green student | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

Can the IPCC seem more ridiculous and agenda-driven? Now comes the most disgraceful example of its cherry-picking

UN climate panel shamed by bogus rainforest claim - Times Online

A STARTLING report by the United Nations climate watchdog that global warming might wipe out 40% of the Amazon rainforest was based on an unsubstantiated claim by green campaigners who had little scientific expertise.

A monster too big for Wong’s leash | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

This figure alone warns of a Five-Year-Plan-style bureaucratic disaster - and the most colossal waste of manpower hours:

WHEN does Penny Wong sleep? According to her Climate Change Department, there are 210,507 documents to help inform or brief her on the government’s emissions trading scheme.