PRIMARY UNITED STATES CLIMATE CENTERS NOW CAUGHT IN DATA MANIPULATION

NOAA and NASA start with the unadjusted NOAA GHCN (Global Historical Climate Network). NASA eliminates some stations and adds some in the polar regions. For NASA, the computer program that manipulates the data is known as GIStemp, Both then add their own adjustments to calculate a global average temperature and a ranking for each month and year. The two inter-related U.S Government agencies have so intertwined their programs and data sets that both are being challenged by the investigating team that has produced this "smoking gun of U.S. Climate-gate.” “We suspect each center will try to hide behind, ‘It’s them; Not us’ and point fingers at each other," says the Computer Programmer from San Jose behind these new revelations.

Inside Europe - E.U. Seeks to Regain Influence on Response to Climate Change [Scam] - NYTimes.com

BRUSSELS — Stunned by having been sidelined in the endgame of the Copenhagen world climate summit meeting, the European Union is debating how to regain influence in the fight against global warming.

[Even the "believers" don't really believe]: Apocalypse Maybe

The problem is that most of the bad stuff won’t be happening for another 20 to 30 years so it is hard to generate a real sense of urgency, especially when there are so many other pressing and very expensive problems that are crying out for immediate attention, Haiti being a good case in point.
...
For today it is safe to call climate change "Apocalypse Maybe." But if we continue to ignore the warning signs from nature, if we continue to pursue the last drop of oil, the last ounce of coal, if we don’t learn to do more with less, if we don’t do a better job of fitting mankind into the global web of life then yes, our children and grandchildren will be looking at "Apocalypse Now."

[Here's an idea: Spend a lot of extra money for solar panels, spend a lot of extra time shivering in the dark when they fail to perform as you'd hoped, and enjoy an extra 6.5 cents annually in carbon credit income!!]

In other words if 10 million typical U.S. homes went solar, supplying 100 percent of their electricity carbon-free, the U.S. would shed 6.5 million tons of CO2 annually. [ie, each home earns .65 of a carbon credit, with carbon credits currently selling at a dime per ton on the Chicago Climate Exchange]