Video: The National Geographic [climate hoax promotion] archives - Antarctica's glacial melt

Antarctica's rapidly disappearing glaciers are an ominous sign of global warming

A Stern look at global warming

One of the reasons Stern recommended we spend 1% of GDP per year, every year, through the end of the century was to forestall dramatic increases in damages due to hurricanes and floods made worse by global warming. Up to 40% of all Stern's projected costs were due to this. And that 40% is based on bad science--contrary to peer-reviewed literature, rejected immediately and not true. However, the total is still there, despite the numbers no longer adding up.

So the Stern report, which was expensive as well as long, is wrong. Because the IPCC was more interested in scoring political points than in publishing accurate, peer-reviewed science.

Tell me again why we need the IPCC?

The Reference Frame: Rajendra, the moth

Well, you can be sure of one thing: difficult insect won't commit seppuku. In the video above, he has the arrogance to boast that he was elected just like the German Führer - by acclamation. In fact, by acclamation by "all the countries in the world". It's pretty clear that he must be liquidated in the same pro-active way, too.

YouTube - Climate change - RT: UN caught lying yet again

Independent scientists have discovered that previous estimates regarding the melt rate of Himalayan glaciers were wrong. Combined with last fall's "climategate" scandal, these findings add to the arguments for climate change skeptics. The agency that issued the report said that the error does not undermine the seriousness of climate change and it is still a threat.