American Thinker: Climategate: What's Wrong with this Picture?

Maximum errors of over 7 [degrees] C! That is almost 14 degrees Fahrenheit. How then is the Nobel Prize winning report able to plot a temperature graph to the tenth of a degree? Is this just sloppy work or could it be deliberate?

As they say on TV infomercials "But wait there's more!" Pealing back the onion another layer reveals more problems. Even the instrument derived temperature data is fraught with problems. The temperature data plotted on the graph is supposed to be a global average. But instrument derived temperature data has not been reliably available on all seven continents for most of the twentieth century. Last time I looked at the globe in my office it had seven continents on it.

RF's Financial News: This week in Barrons - 2-21-10

Conspiracy Theory: It didn't take long to realize that the true ‘global warming’ agenda – and that was to tax people and have more control over lives. He who rules the energy, rules the people. Now that the entire scam has been exposed, from the leaked emails where the scientists hid data and "made up" theories, to scientists saying we haven't warmed at all since 1995 and are probably cooling, to high profile global warming advocates quitting in disgrace.

Facebook’s Response to Greenpeace « Data Center Knowledge

It’s true that the local utility for the region we chose, Pacific Power, has an energy mix that is weighted slightly more toward coal than the national average.

Brutal weather, frozen ground delays burials, closure for families | delmarvanow.com | The Daily Times

It's a predicament faced by many cemeteries, hospitals and mortuaries that worked to preserve the sanctity of death while Mother Nature pummeled the region with high winds and more than 2 feet of snowfall.

Climate alarmists feeling more heat

But discredited data-fudgers have too much at stake to give up now