Die Klimazwiebel: Science magazine confused about who is a “prominent climate scientist”?
Having worked since the early 1980 in climate science (I believe), I have learned that there is no specific climate disciplineC3: Is Melting Tundra & Permafrost The CO2 "Tipping Point" of Runaway Warming? Peer-Research Says No
As with every unsubstantiated, speculative prediction made by alarmists and climate models, there is a grain of truth regarding melting tundra/permafrost releasing stored carbon dioxide. But researchers have discovered that when these melted areas are thawed, the explosion of new growth of vegetation becomes a positive CO2 sink that sequesters carbon dioxide in greater quantities than that released from the thaw. So instead of permafrost melting being a positive warming feedback, it actually becomes a negative feedback - funny how the climate always seems to do that in the end.Al Gore Snowman Contest - HUMAN EVENTS
HUMAN EVENTS announces its first ever Al Gore Snowman contest. Our friend Amb. Fred Eckert suggested that we award a prize for the best snowman made to look like the chief poobah of global warming baloney, former Vice President Al Gore.The climate change debate heats up « The Economic Voice
With Washington digging out of a near-record snowfall, it’s only appropriate to (dis)honor the principal perpetrator of biggest fraud since the UN’s Oil for Food scandal. (That one, after all, only cost about $30 billion. The global warming “cap and tax” legislation will cost much more.)
The message both sides should take, is that the science is not settled and it never will be while big money is at stake. Money to fund research is as much an attraction to scientists as bonuses are to bankers. Maybe the big step we could take forward in science is to sort out how we fund research and anything that falls outside of that cannot be used by public bodies in formulating policy and setting tax levels.
No comments:
Post a Comment