Hot Air » Blog Archive » Quotes of the day
RUSH: You gotta listen to this, folks. These are Democrats complaining global warming proved by no snow. No snow in Washington, 2002, proves global warming. Yesterday and the day before, all of this snow in Washington proves global warming. They both can’t be right. Here’s Barbara Boxer, October 29th, 2007, on the Senate floor.The Migrant Mind: Another IPCC mistake--Bias with residence time
The data doesn't support the IPCC contention that carbon dioxide has a residence time of 200 years. If that were true, we should have far more C14-based carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than we do. Its short residence time shows that the IPCC is simply making this up as they go along.Real Climate: Spin and Facts « the Air Vent
Power Line - More Signs of Global Warming“As far as we’re aware, so far only one–or at most two–legitimate errors have been found in the AR4:”Which is more error than Real Climate has admitted since inception. Think about where you have to be at mentally to make this claim. They then go on to try and explain away several other obvious IPCC exaggerations. Hell, these are the two errors the global warming biased MSM was bright enough forced to figure out and publish and RC is only saying one or maybe two. hahaha.
Here in Minnesota, we've been out of the headlines for a while. Others have been bearing the brunt of a winter that is also pretty formidable here. I heard on the radio this morning that in Minneapolis, we have more snow on the ground than we've seen for a number of years. I don't think anyone claims that we're getting a lot of snow because it's so warm. The Minneapolis Star Tribune highlights a Wisconsin farmer who built a snow house in his back yard, measuring 58 feet long, 26 feet wide and 11 feet tall. This is a photo of the interior; it brings back memories of my youth. Back in South Dakota, we liked to dig snow caves, although admittedly they were never quite this large.Global warming: Phil Jones and the upcoming investigation--the Kabuki Dance begins
Given that the make-up of the investigating panel is already known to be heavily sympathetic towards CRU, given that the prima facie evidence shows real and serious wrong-doing, given that Jones has already stepped down temporarily for the investigation, what seems clear to me is that Jones is trying to avoid getting thrown under a bus or used as a sacrificial lamb. Some of the things he said in the BBC interview were just dangerous enough to the party line as to hint that, if he is made the whipping boy, he might whip back.
No comments:
Post a Comment