Inventing Green « Awesome Twitter Exchange on the Politics of Clean Energy

DR: @JesseJenkins For the millionth time, nobody’s arguing abt whether it wd be good to invest more & create more jobs. It’s a straw man.

JJ: @drgrist you still have made no case to that effect, (while many others see differently). Arg to date appears “it offends my sensibilities."

Only In It For The Gold: A Hill of Snow

[Alarmist Michael Tobis] Irritating though it is to see Climate Depot always featuring cold or snowy weather, Morano in this interview completely demolishes his opponent, who is bound and determined to make this huge snow event evidence "for", um, "climate change".

UN panel will give $126b for climate [hoax]

UNITED NATIONS chief Ban Ki-moon has set up a high-level advisory panel to mobilise more than $US112 billion ($126.2 billion) in funding to help developing nations battle climate change.
...
Mexico is to host the next UN-sponsored climate summit in the beach resort of Cancun from November 29 to December 10.

Skeptic's Corner: A Long Road Home Revisited

I have a suggestion for our nation's policy in regards to the Arctic, Al Gore not withstanding. It gets extremely cold there and there will be ice so build the damned ships.

Boulton’s 18 Years at UEA « Climate Audit

...the Inquiry bio left out Boulton’s 18 years of employment at the University of East Anglia.

I understand that climate scientists think that leaving out adverse information is a “good way to deal with a problem”, but people who aren’t climate scientists think that it’s a trick.

Royal Society of Edinburgh, Oct 29, 2009 « Climate Audit

There are thousands of people in the world who are qualified to serve on this inquiry who have never met Jones, Briffa and/or Mitchell; who haven’t worked for 18 years at the University of East Anglia and who aren’t currently active in climate change policy advocacy – people who meet Muir Russell’s criteria of having “no prejudicial interest in climate change and climate science”. Boulton isn’t one of them.

Boulton and Glaciergate « Climate Audit

In a Jan 29, 2008 speech, Boulton reported that by 2050 “most of the Himalayan glaciers would be gone”

Former NASA scientist defends theory refuting global warming doctrine

Examiner.com: Are man-made CO2 emissions the cause of global warming?
Dr. Miskolczi: Apparently not. According to my research, increases in CO2 levels have not increased the global-average absorbing power of the atmosphere.

Tim Lambert: How I "wiped the floor" with Monckton | Australian Climate Madness

[UPDATE: I should also add that Lambert's five minute sum up at the end was particularly weak (actually lasting about two minutes), allowing Monckton really to cash in with a far more powerful conclusion. You can watch them here and make up your own mind - Ed]

If the science is so settled and Lambert was so right and Monckton so wrong, it certainly didn't show. The debate isn't over.