Sunday, February 21, 2010

Number of storms may drop, but more could be intense, study says / The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
For instance, the team notes, the IPCC's 2007 Fourth Assessment Report concluded that, "more likely than not," global warming helped fuel a rise in the number of the most intense tropical cyclones. Sunday’s review doesn't support that statement, the team writes, citing uncertainties in records for storms globally, as well as the influence of natural variability in the Atlantic.

In that region, records do suggest a recent increase in storm intensity. But it's unclear, the team says, how much of that change is because of natural swings in conditions that take place over many decades, and how much may be due to the effects of global warming.
Check this out: 75 reasons to be skeptical of "global warming"

Pajamas Media » Climategate: The World’s Biggest Story, Everywhere but Here
The biggest scandal of our times is a non-story to U.S media. Why are the London papers covering the Climategate collapse, but not ours?
...
Thanks to Gerard Vanderleun of the American Digest blog — and his link to Tom Nelson, one of my new favorite climate aggregators — we might have an answer.
Global warming: The most bizarre statement in the history of science
...to baldly state that McIntyre's work is leading to a reduction in human knowledge is not just wrong, it goes against the basic organising principles that have made science such a powerful force for good in this world.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Anything that comes out of Gavin's mouth can be classified as the stupidity of a climate scientologist.

He's become quite the pathetic excuse for a scientist.

I'd fire him and the rest of his skanky lot for abuse of trust and spending all his time they operating a private opinion blog that promotes an agenda that gets Gavin closer to collecting a taxpayer funded pension.

FIRE THEM ALL./