[Obama to blow billions of additional dollars on the lowest priority of American voters] - The Globe and Mail
NASA will also spend an additional $2.5-billion over five years for more research on how global warming is affecting Earth, including replacing a carbon dioxide monitoring satellite that crashed last year.Obama: cap-and-trade [scam] may be separate in Senate bill | Reuters
Obama made it clear during a question and answer period with a crowd in New Hampshire that he wanted a market mechanism to put a price on carbon. He said that even with advanced technology, coal -- a highly-polluting fossil fuel -- would continue to be cheaper to buy than cleaner, renewable energy.Emerging Infectious Diseases in Response to Climate Change | The New York Academy of Sciences
A market mechanism would address that by making companies pay for using fuels that emit more carbon dioxide, one of the most common greenhouse gases blamed for warming the earth.
"The concept of incentivizing clean energy so that it's the cheaper, more effective kind of energy is one that is proven to work and is actually a market-based approach," Obama said.
"Does it make sense for us to start pricing in the fact that this thing's really bad for the environment and, if we do, then can we do it in a way that doesn't involve some big bureaucracy and a control-and-command system, but just says...there's going to be a price to pollution," he said.
"Then everybody can adapt and decide which are...the best energies," he said.
Human activities have caused sharp increases in atmospheric greenhouse gasses and aerosols, which are very likely causing significant changes in climate. These include increases in the global average temperatures - enhanced over land and in Arctic regions, changes in seasonality, ocean warming, more intense precipitation and alterations to the rainfall patterns - particularly in the tropics and sub-tropics.Cameron and his suicidal eco-rats clamber aboard sinking ship – Telegraph Blogs
Climate and weather are important components of complex ecosystems, and with these changes, the dynamic balance between the living components of ecosystems is often disturbed. Ecosystem instability can result in changes in pathogen prevalence, altered pathogen transmission profiles, and increased host susceptibility. These instabilities can have dramatic affects on the health of humans, livestock, wildlife, and marine systems.
Is David Cameron’s inner circle really so out of touch that not one of them is aware how quickly the AGW scam is unravelling – with even the Guardian and Geoffrey Lean nuancing their ideological positions?
When Osborne talks about the “green jobs” his brave new economic model is going to generate, is he really not aware of the pitiful example of Spain where for every “green job” created through government spending 2.2 jobs have been LOST in the real economy?
No comments:
Post a Comment