Pacific Legal Foundation vs. EPA on Endangerment (Bad science, bad policy can be avoided) — MasterResource

Since the Climategate scandal broke, there have been other revelations: Amazongate, Glaciergate and most recently the faulty Dutch sea level issue. Most recently, Phil Jones, the scientist at the center of the CRU scandal, has hinted strongly about exaggeration and uncertainty regarding about both recent and historical warming.

All in all that’s at least four strikes against the EPA relying blindly on the IPCC report. Any private company with a due-diligence record like that would be seeing IRS and SEC agents knocking at their door with formal complaints. One can reasonably expect that either EPA will get back to the drawing board or the courts will force them to do so. It’s a whole new ball game.

PRUDEN: The red-hot scam unravels - Washington Times

You can fool some of the people some of the time, as Abraham Lincoln observed, and you even can fool all the people some of the time. But you can't fool all the people all the time. Al Gore and his friends got so excited about points one and especially point two that they forgot point three.

Recent papers posted at SPPI | The SPPI Blog

Recent papers posted at Science and Public Policy Institute:

FAIL… Just 6% of Americans Believe Obama’s $787 Billion Stimulus Created Jobs

[I wonder how many Americans now believe that cap and tax would create jobs?]