Part six: Emails reveal strenuous efforts by climate scientists to 'censor' their critics | Environment | guardian.co.uk
Peer review has been put under strain by conflicts of interest that would not be allowed in most professionsBrilliant: 'Vagina Monologues' Creator Tells Palin to Look at 'Earthquakes and Tsunamis' for Global Warming Proof | NewsBusters.org
ENSLER: Well, I just think the idea that she doesn't believe in global warming is bizarre.Google Translate: Climate-gate, Amazon-gate, Glacier-gate
BEHAR: Every scientist at every note believes in it but Sarah Palin doesn't believe in it.
ENSLER: And I think we just kind of have to walk around the world at this point and look at what is happening to nature and earthquakes and tsunamis.
The climate threat is still just as real, but carelessness, naivete and exaggerations from activists, scientists and the IPCC has given the climate skeptics, water mill, creating the media storm, but also brought out important criticism of a research community not to believe had the need to exaggerate.New study: could the sun have warmed the world? | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
Why is Rohling’s research interesting? Because the IPCC’s argument that man’s gases have caused most of the post-war warming is based not on proof that those gases did indeed do that, but on an inability to think of any other cause. Rohling suggests he may just have found that alternative explanation, or part of it.Climate Group Admits Mistakes - WSJ.com
And, he adds, our long-tern future looks chilly.
Officials say they don't know of additional mistakes in the IPCC's seminal 2007 report, but they say that, given that the report runs more than 3,000 pages, additional mistakes may come to light. "I do not expect serious mistakes," Mr. Edenhofer said. "But I'm quite sure that if people read the 3,000 pages, there will be some more mistakes."Investors.com - NOAA's Ministry Of Propaganda
....
A U.N. spokesman said IPCC rules don't appear to give the U.N. secretary-general authority to dismiss the IPCC chairman, and noted that Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon hasn't called for Mr. Pachauri's departure. Under IPCC rules, the panel's members—national-government officials—choose the IPCC chairman.
...
"It's not useful when mistakes are made, but the overwhelming body of evidence [on climate change] is not disturbed by those events," Todd Stern, the Obama administration's top international negotiator on climate-change policy, told an audience Tuesday at the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning Washington think tank. "It's nothing short of crazy for us to put our heads in the sand and do nothing" about climate change.
Hoaxes: Despite failures at Copenhagen, the fraud of the IPCC and the farce of Climate-gate, the administration wants an agency to monitor climate change. Why must we fund one-stop shopping for climate charlatans?
...
"This service will be a vital part of our growing body of knowledge on climate change and will be held to the highest standards of scientific integrity and transparency," said Rep. Edward Markey, Massachusetts Democrat and co-author of the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill. After the IPCC and CRU scandals, the "growing body of knowledge" he speaks of is now a collapsed house of cards.
Undaunted by facts, U.S. climate envoy Todd Stern gave the U.N. notice on Jan. 26 that this country, ignoring observable data that the globe is cooling, the will of the American people and the failure of Copenhagen, is still committing itself to a 17% emissions cut in carbon dioxide and other gases by 2020 from 2005 levels.
This is an absurd policy based on fraudulent data that will doom the American economy and American workers to Third World status without denting global temperatures by a fraction of a degree.
No comments:
Post a Comment