Voyageurs to Track Moose in 2010

Voyageurs National Park has new plans that will aide in the investigation of the effects of climate change on moose pollution in the park. Up to 14 adult moose will be tagged with state-of-art telemetry collars in February.

The project is a collaborative effort among scientists from the park, the University of Minnesota-Duluth's Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI), and the U.S. Geological Survey. Collars are equipped with GPS receivers that will record each animal's position every 15 minutes. Each collar is also fitted with external temperature and activity sensors, and will be retrieved when animals are recaptured in February 2011.

Discovery News - Unscientific Survey: Global Warming Issue is Waning

It is impossible to keep track of the new information showing that what one wag calls the "grantrepreneurs" of science have finally coming under mainstream scrutiny in the global warming scandals.
...
The cover-ups have been successful in some cases, but not entirely. What is stunning is the failure of the "consensus science" scolds to defend the situation. They are reduced, it seems, to repeating the old mantras that everyone knows, there is "overwhelming evidence," etc. What they do not do is debate

CTV Toronto - 'Snowmageddon' cleanup could take days - CTV News, Shows and Sports -- Canadian Television

...60 centimetres or more were reported in Washington, D.C., Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
...
Saturday's snow comes less than two months after more than 40 centimetres of snow were dumped on Washington in a storm on Dec. 19.

Such heavy snowfalls are rare for the area. The National Weather Service says that since 1870, there have only been 13 storms in Washington in which more than 30 centimetres of snow fell at a time.

Global warming: Climategate's Phil Jones after the fall

This is plausible, if not overwhelming, evidence that Phil Jones broke the law. There is no question that he was trying to evade the requirements to make public data available to any who legitimately requested it. Indeed, he did make the data available to other colleagues who requested it but not to those he considered skeptical. Jones is the one, after all, who wrote "We have 25 years invested in this – why should we let you see the data when your only objective is to find something wrong with it”?