Wednesday, March 10, 2010

American Thinker: The Philosophic Roots of Eco-Theology
Man-made global warming (AGW) is and always has been a complete and utter fraud, but the battle is far from over. There remains, however, the question of origins. Or, as David Byrne might put it, "Where?! How...did...I...get...here?!"
World Climate Report » Baseball’s Back—With More Peanuts Than Ever
We get the message loud and clear – like virtually every other plant on the Earth, peanuts love higher levels of CO2 (and we love peanuts)!
[Will this legislation result in a measurable "improvement" in global temperature?]: California to Regulate ‘Most Potent’ Greenhouse Gas - Green Inc. Blog - NYTimes.com
Starting in 2011, California will regulate emissions from electric utility equipment of the gas sulfur hexafluoride — commonly called SF6. It is typically used in high voltage transmission systems in circuit breakers, switches and insulation, according to a recent California Air Resources Board announcement.

“Although it is only used in small amounts, sulfur hexafluoride is the most potent of all the gases that cause global warming,” the Air Resources Board’s chairwoman, Mary D. Nichols, said in the announcement.
American Thinker: California's Toxic Air Scare Machine
CARB has an annual budget of 1.2 billion dollars, 90% of it supplied by fine and penalty income from California business and industry. CARB and its allies in the media and the environmental movement are used to having their way.

Not this time, not yet, and that's the story to tell.
C3: Another Failed Prediction: Latest Peer-Research Finds Claims of Increased Mudslides Due To Global Warming Is Wrong
The pro-IPCC climate scientists predicted that mudslides and landslides (debris-flow) would increase due to global warming. Researchers examined the historical evidence and found the prediction to be without empirical merit. It appears that the left/liberal/progressive global warming, alarmist scientists (and IPCC) are again caught hyping calamitous predictions without the requisite scientific evidence.

No comments: