The Economist: not a serious journal – Telegraph Blogs

Some of the Economist’s readers, admittedly, stand to grow very very rich if this AGW scam is allowed to progress to its full and terrible conclusion. Many, many more though, stand to end up considerably poorer.

I know The Economist makes a fair bit of money out of all those taxpayer-funded bribe ads from the Carbon Trust. I know in the world of business dosh is jolly important. But isn’t integrity more so?

C3: Non-CO2 Caused Global Warming In Lithuania Is Documented: Major Climate Change Unrelated To Humans

As an example, in Lithuania, researchers have now documented what real unprecedented climate change means and it happened without a trace of the evil human CO2....

Council cuts down 6,000 trees to act as deterrent at 'dogging' site - Telegraph

A council has backed the removal of 6,000 trees at a beauty spot, saying that the clearance will deterrent to people meeting for sex in the woods.
...
A spokesman for United Utilities said: "They were old and at risk of falling into the road causing an accident. Following a health and safety survey, a license was applied for and granted through the Forestry Commission to fell them.

You can't predict the weather; or climate change - Telegraph

Our weather forecasts will always be as unreliable as our predictions of climate change.