Friday, March 05, 2010

EU Referendum: Five times the cost of the Manhattan Project
If we take all the Annex 1 countries, the sum expended must be well over $100 billion.

That, in terms of equivalent spending, is about five times the cost of the wartime Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb – then the most expensive ever project. It rather puts the current effort in perspective, especially as we seem to have very little to show for it, other than a very large number of academics bought and paid-for by the climate change lobby.
EU Referendum: They just don't get it
After all these years, they have been completely submerged in their own propaganda, to the extent that they cannot drag themselves free of it. Global "warming" is not and cannot be an "observable" fact. The very concept of a global temperature is an artefact, and the recorded figures are statistical constructs – of extremely dubious provenance.

The more they struggle to deny that their religion is a belief system, the more evident it becomes that that is precisely what it is.
Slow warming now makes predictions about 2100 less likely
Every year that passes with a lower rate of warming makes long range predictions of severe temperature rises much less likely.
Comment by Bill Gray, Professor Emeritus, Colorado State University on Kerry Emanuel’s Boston Globe (15 February 2010) Op/Ed piece titled “Climate Changes Are Proven Fact.” | Climate Realists
This piece has many inaccuracies, and in my view, is not a positive contribution to the global warming debate for the reasons I present in my rebuttal of various Emanuel statements.
Gutting the credibiltiy of question? « the Air Vent
I’m curious how they will gut the credibility of people who question the science conclusions, while simultaneously hiding, modifying, and suppressing inconvenient data and exaggerating results. This should be a really special trick. My guess is that planning a fifty thousand dollar ad in a left wing paper won’t have that big an effect. It would make a fun blog post though, which we can then use to mock it — for free.

Only in climate science can this be considered true genius.

No comments: