Thursday, March 11, 2010

Green Mondays: highlighting the Government’s role in successful carbon management
Everyone at the carbon management strategies table agreed that putting a price on emissions is essential, but also that any price much be sufficiently high to encourage serious emission reductions.
Political ads: new weapon in U.S. climate change war?
(Reuters) - Big business is now free to blitz the airwaves to attack politicians who support action against climate change, which could smother messages from environmentalists.
...
Environmental groups used to be able to get free media coverage by pitching stories to reporters. Now many journalists who wrote about those issues are gone, and the space available for coverage of the environment is shrinking.
RealClimate [fraud]: Sealevelgate
First, although the temperature scenarios of IPCC project a maximum warming of 6.4 ºC (Table SPM3), the upper limit of sea level rise has been computed for a warming of only 5.2 ºC – which reduced the estimate by about 15 cm. Second, the IPCC chose to compute sea level rise up to the year 2095 rather than 2100 – just to cut off another 5 cm.
Goliath’s Panic Begins « Harold Ambler
A new editorial in Nature is startling for what it reveals, especially the fact Paul Ehrlich is a go-to figure about how hard scientists have it when it comes to media access. Ehrlich is an individual who became an international celebrity by spinning one frightening story after another (about the death of the oceans, for one thing) who maintains, with a straight face, that he and his fellow scientists have an unfair disadvantage in communicating their side of the climate debate. He is quoted by Nature as saying, regarding the aftermath of Climategate and the fact that skeptic scientists are finally getting a hearing, “Everyone is scared shitless, but they don’t know what to do.” People often forget: Goliath, right before the end, sensed that something was amiss.

1 comment:

susan said...

Joanne Nova was on John Batchelor show again tonight. Bob Zimmerman on as well for contrast. Seemed to agree most money for climate research comes from US interests and if scientists said there was no AGW they would lose their job. It does not take a degree in science to know this. Even today, only real resistance is from unpaid retirees without PR departments.